Famine in Third World States Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1000 words

Famine in Third World States - Essay Examplesolely the countries of Africa are still dying of hunger. Why is thatThe main myth is that there is insufficient amount of foodstuffs produced in the country. But the fact is that the planet produces enough food to provide every individual with 3,500 calories every day. The problem is that legion(predicate) mountain are too poor to buy food, though even the poorest countries possess sufficient plain lands, and even export their products.In 1974 an outstanding philosopher Robert Nozick has created his theory of entitlement, which was outlined in his work Anarchy, say, utopia. The main geological period of the theory is that the rights of an individual are sacred, and alienation of the property must be voluntary. He has acknowledged the need of the borderline state which would deprive individuals the right of violence, but at the same time it would protect them from tyranny. Nozick was sure that any sample to regulate the process of the property transfers is doomed to fail. The state must not dictate any redistribution of wealth, which gouge be presented in value system. Nozick has absolutely rejected any idea of a companionable state.It has always been lax to make nature guilty in people suffering from famine. But it should be remembered that only the poorest layers of the ordering suffer from hunger, though the nature is the same for everyone. The roots of the problem lie in political sympathies, which makes effectiveness the corner-stone, and not sympathy. People are deprived of the right to earn enough money, they are made starve, thus graceful ready to give away their labor force for the minimal payment. The growth of population is also considered a problem. But it is interesting that active growth of population has never been a problem to developing countries. much(prenominal) problem appears only in those countries where ineffective political system deprives people equal access to education, medi cine, workplaces and social guarantees. According to Nozick, all actions of individuals must be voluntary, and here we see an absolutely different situation the politics of the starving countries is consciously directed at depriving people of all possible rights. In the countries of the third creative activity land belongs to large owners, who often appear to be ineffective in terms of business. The world take shows, that small farmers receive 4-5 times larger crops than big farmers do. But in poor countries the inner form _or_ system of government is directed at concentrating all the land in the hand of few owners, thus giving people no right for equal access to land and its products. Nozick was the supporter of the idea that all individuals must ca-ca free access to all resources and he also bore an idea of the free market with minimal limitations. But I should say, that to my mind, the idea of free market have never solved the problem of famine. The principle free market is good, government is bad has never helped with eliminating famine in third world states. In every state government is occupied with the redistribution of resources. In this problem authorities must help consumers, especially the poorest ones, with the help of tax preferences, grants, and credits. In such situation the state and the population supplement each other thus creating an