Matching Dell

The unified dingle blood task case by (Rivkin. J & Porter, M) defines the individualised ready reckoner attention and taboolines its history and development, with focus on dingle Computers. This paper give analyze the case study by means of the Strategic agency Analysis and Planning Method (SSAP), by portraying and equivalence dingle with its main competitors, namely IBM, Compaq, Hewllet-Packard and door.Approaching the strategic situation from SSAP methods step number one, Financial Analysis, step number two, External Business environs Analysis and step number three, Business and Corporate outline Analysis, an external analyst perspective will be drawn base on past , present and future trends that will be utilize to give recommendations of investments to potential investors. The Personal Computer Industry From its inception the calculator industry was mainly composed of stupendous confederacys such as IBM and decline and unaffordable, heavy hardwargon such as ma inframe ready reckoners.Having a personalisedised computer at lieu was a mere aspi dimensionn those days. betwixt 1975 and 1981 many discoeries occurred that gained touristedity with electronic hobbyists, when pre-assembled personal computers entered the trade. These computers were pioneered by firms such as apple Computers, MITS and sm aloneer ones such as Tandy/RadioShack and Commodore. Al near immediately, new(prenominal) major electronic firms entered the securities industry of personal computers. These companies focused their note on other electronic industries before this.The pioneer of the first personal computer was IBM in 1981 and its advantage translated to a foodstuff sh be of 42% of the market two years later. Although, IBM produced close to of the components for its mainframes computers, for PCs it purchased from others the required parts and then assembled the machines. The beam softw ar for IBMs first PC was custom-made by Microsoft, which was then ju st a start-up softwargon firm. The micro exerciseor for the operating system (OS) was designed by Intel, a nonher stomach that benefited from the partnership with IBM.Microsofts first operating system to IBM is the backbone coordinate for all the current versions of operating systems (OS) implemented by Microsoft. A patented system developed by Apple, held 20% of the market by 1983. In 1982, another firm named Compaq entered the market with a low- footingd portable clon and had $100 million in revenues during its first year, which turned out to be the fastest growing phoner in American history. By 1984, dingle Computer Corporation entered the market and transformed the way PCs were assembled and distributed.Historically, what has really revolutionized the PC industry was the establishment by IBM of an open architecture for their first PC, make its operating system and other proprietary information available to hike up software developers to write programs for the IBM PC and to motivate other firms to make congruous peripherals. Moreover, the unfore externalisen business strategy at IBM caused the come with to become under attack(predicate) to other market entrants and lost their sustainable agonistical advantage, since many other IBM clones were manufactured. This cased the company to lose market share to competitors.Step oneness Financial Analysis Financial Position dells pecuniary history, like most companys, changes over different periods. These changes can be attributed to changes in the demand of the product, scientific advancements, manufacturing salute, competition, and economic conditions. In 1999, the approximate cost of manufacturing a basic personal computer was between $800 and $900 (Kwak & Yoffie 1999). dingle sold computers influencely, and through retail distributors.In 1994, dingle actually lost specie on retail gross revenue. When examine dells direct gross revenue agreements to the retail channel it shows that there wa s a 5. % operating income through the direct gross sales, and a -3. 0% operating income in retail sales. Dells market share increases from 1. 0 in 1990 to 13. 2 in 1998. figure sales of Dell personal computers through telephone, mail, and internet helped increase their market share. The resume market size for the personal computer industry is $74. 6 million. represent 4 Portion of gross sales Through Each Channel by Region from the Matching Dell Case shows the highest channels in which personal computers are distributed in different geographic areas.In the Americas, the most popular channel is distributor/reseller which accounts for 41. 2% of sales, second is the direct channel which accounts for 29. 7% of sales, and third is the retail channel which accounts for 21. 7% of the sales. These three channels are the top channels world wide, and distributor/reseller is the channel with the highest serving of sales across the board. Income Statements Dell and its competitors Compaq, penetration, and HP all have had their revenues increase over the period between 1991 and 1998.The companies differ when the net income is compared from the same time period. In the Appendix, parry 4 Profit as a Percentage of Sales shows a comparison between 1991 and 1998. Profit as a lot of sales is a note worthy computation because it shows a ratio of profits to sales. If a company has high sales it does not of necessity mean that it will have high profits. In Table 4, you see that in 1998 Dell has the highest profit as a percentage of sales. Since Compaq has a negative net income in this year, its data is skewed. Dell percentage of sale has grown by 2. % in this seven year period.Using the calculation (This Year)/Base Year x 100 and data from 1991, to 1998 Dell sales increase 20. 5% and net income increased 28. 63%. This shows that profits increased more than sales in the same time period. This means that Dell became more efficient in production which yielded greater profits . Net income increase more than sales shows Dells efficiency in production and distribution. It cut be of making and selling its computers to have a greater profit. In the appendix, Table 1 shows the year on year percent changes for Dells sales.This table shows that Dells sales continue to grow each year. Price Comparison record 9 in the Matching Dell Case shows Ratings of High-end Desktop PCs by Consumer Reports(1998). It is shown on the table that Dells product sells for $2400, HPs product sells for $2200, Gateways product sells for $2647, and Compaqs product sells for $2950. Data on the same table rates these computers on price, speed, quality, and other things customers value in computers with a scale of 1 creation excellent and 5 being poor.When the customer ratings are fairishd Gateway has a rating of 1. , Dell and HP have a rating of 2. 4, and Compaq has a rating of 2. 7. Dell is the net in price and second highest in rating. This shows that customers are satisfied with the dell computer, more so than some of the more expensive brands. Company profitableness Exhibit 11 from the case compares Major PC Manufactures and their financial data. fall down on Equity(hard roe) is calculated in this table and the major players can be compared. The roe shows the profitability of a corporation because it shows how much profit is generated from the money the shareholders have invested.Dell has a ROE of 62. %, Gateway has a ROE of 25. 7%, HP has a ROE of 17. 4%, and Compaq has a ROE of -24. 2%. HP and Compaq have substantially more revenue than Dell. Compaq does not have a higher net income, but HP does. At first glance you would think that HP is a better company in regards to personal computers but when you look at the ROE you celebrate a difference. Out of all the major competitors in the personal computer industry Dell has the highest ROE. Therefore it is the most successful company in this market. It would be recommended that investors invest in Dell to achieve the most out of their investment. RevenuesDells company became more successful when it withdrew from retail in 1994. It was losing money by distributing its computers in this channel and learned from its mi involvements. In 1996 it started its website which provided another opportunity for customers to secern from them directly. Exhibit 11 also shows that Dell salves its cost structure pooh-pooh than its competitors. When something is not benefiting the company, Dell does not wait, it acts on it and tries to continue to make Dell a successful corporation. Compaq has very, very high revenues but there are obviously major problems with the company.Its net income and ROE are negative numbers, which shows that the company is not profitable in 1998. Compaq only has 4. 4% of sales from direct sales, where Dell has 86. 6%. This is a major advantage to Dell because there is no middle man and Dell can obtain all profits. In ratings of PC Vendors by Corporate Managers with PC buyin g tariff (Exhibit 8), Dell Ranks high in substance abuser satisfaction, extremely high in raw technology, second highest in pricing, and moderately high in inspection and repair and support. Compaq ranks high in pricing but low in user satisfaction, raw technology, and all customer relations.Having quality customer services gives Dell an advantage over Compaq. Financial Conclusion The financial performance of Dell, Compaq, HP, Gateway and other companies in the PC industry we see that high revenues do not always translate into a profitable company. Shareholders and investors are smell for high haves on the amount they invest in their respected companies. Dell is the most profitable company as of 1998 with the highest return on investment. The most valued aspect of Dells company at this time is the use of the direct sales channel.Also, Dell sells its computers at a cheaper price than its competitors but pipe down ranks high in customer satisfaction surveys. Dell can broaden a l ower price by keeping its manufacturing and selling costs down. This way it can still make a profit and keep and attract customers. Dell started out as a small military operation in a college dorm room and it continues to grow significantly on a yearly basis. Step Two External Business Environment Analysis The market for computer systems and services is subject to intense price competition.In addition to several large branded companies, there are other branded and generic competitors. Dell competes primarily based on its technology, direct customer relationships, value, performance, customer service, quality, and reliability. Its main competitors are Compaq, and Gateway, both business are 90% PC dependent. However, due to Compaqs low financial performance, HP was Dells primary competitor followed by Gateway in 1998. The main stakeholders group are customers, competitors, suppliers, shareholders, employees and the government.In Table 6 in the Appendix theTarget Customer-or-Client Product-or-Service Connections is shown. The PC competitive environment can be distinguished between its geographic and its customer categories. The geographic market for the PC industry is segmented by worldwide and U. S basis market share, while the customer category is segmented into Large business, small & midsize business, home and small business, government and educational institutions.Based on the information from Exhibit 11 in the Matching Dell case, Compaq leads the U.S and the worldwide market with 16. 4% and 16. 6% of PC shares respectively. Dell comes in second regulate with 10. 4% in the worldwide market share and 15. 1% in the U. S. PC market share. Gateway follows in behind both companies with a 4. 2% worldwide share and 8. 1% in the U. S. By comparing the major players we can see that Compaq is a leader in the market, hitherto these market leadership if compared with the companys financial information is not translated into profits, since it has a negative profit marking and a negative return on equity (ROE).ROE is one of the best measures of a corporations profitability, since it shows investors and stakeholders how much profit the company generates with the money shareholders have invested and for Compaq a negative ROE could be an indication that even if it has the greater market share amongst the PC industry there are problems with the bottom line net income and management issues. The customer group of Large Business is henpecked by Dell Computers with 33. 6% market share followed by Compaq with 27. 5%.In the case of Small & Midsize business, Dell has a 37% against a 32. % market share held by Compaq. Moreover, in the Home & Small office PC sales customer category, Gateway has the leadership by large from its closest competitor HP with a 58. 2% share against a 33. 3% held by HP and Compaq comes next with a 28. 5% stake of the market. In addition, Gateway also has a leadership in the program line segment of the market, with a 8. 2% market share trailed by Compaq with 5. 3%.The government sectors is mostly equally divided amongst the PC industry competitors, with shares ranging from 5. 1% to 6. %, leveraging a very close competition. Growth rates and the percentage changes help to analyze and understand the companies being assessed. The overall performance of the PC industry has been assessed from 1989 to 1998 and the results are as follows (Conclusions from Exhibit 2) Dells appendage rate on average was 50. 5% for the period 1989 to 1998, while Compaq grew an average of 17. 9%.If this percentage change had not being analyzed in depth, one could think that Gateway had a greater egress than Dell Computers from its inception it had an 87. % growth rate. However, if the first two years of operation were take away from the calculations, we can see that the actual growth rate for Gateways would only be 19. 5%, which would place it behind Dell. Compaq had and average growth of 17. 9% in the same period. Five forces comp etitive analysis and industry value chain (Diagram 1). Dell manufactures most of the products it sells and has manufacturing locations worldwide to service its international customer base.Dell believes that its manufacturing processes and supply-chain management techniques provide it a distinct competitive advantage. Its build-to-order manufacturing process is designed to allow Dell to significantly reduce cost while simultaneously providing customers the ability to customize their product purchases. In addition, Dell purchases some of its products from third-party original equipment manufacturers and resells them under the Dell name. Dells manufacturing process consists of assembly, software installation, functional testing, and quality control.Testing and quality control processes are also applied to components, parts, and subassemblies obtained from third-party suppliers. Quality control is maintained through the testing of components, subassemblies, and systems at various stag es in the manufacturing process. Quality control also includes a burn-in period for completed units after assembly, on-going production reliability audits, failure tracking for early identification of production and component problems, and information from Dells customers obtained through services and support programs.